Psychology & Sex, New DSM Sexual Disorders & Psychiatry Sexual Abuse, Mental Health
Psychology & Sex, New DSM Sexual Disorders & Psychiatry Sexual Abuse, Mental Health Kayleigh discuss the American Psychiatric Associations new proposed changes for the DSM and strange occurrence that there seems to be a preponderance of psychiatrists and mental health professionals sexually abusing their patients. It’s strange that a profession rife with sexual abuse problems want to create a host of new sexual psychological disorders. Be My Friend – www.myspace.com This video was produced by Psychetruth www.myspace.com www.youtube.com psychetruth.blogspot.com © Copyright 2010 Target Public Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Lachdenan said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 4:00 pm
What’s wrong with soliciting your patients for sex? Some people could use the “therapy,” I would think. Hippocratic Oath, man.
marsbarz said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 4:06 pm
3 counts of masturbation
wow, that does sound terrible.
where i come from, masturbation is legal and okay
its called, get this, reality
i must have accidentally made my way back to disneyland in my amazing time machine and will have to jerk my way outta here
saei said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 4:36 pm
ALL human beings have “faults” or “disorders” we deal with on a daily basis.
A degree in any field doesn’t nullify this fact. That would be to say nutritionist don’t eat junk food or cops simply don’t commit crimes. If anything this only again proves our sameness on this little dysfunctional rock we call earth =)
GaryNull said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 4:56 pm
@JenkemJiggabooJew >> Its a Jewish profession after all.
That goes without saying, lol.
nodnarbjaylocke said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 4:57 pm
@GaryNull Slandering people is evil.
nodnarbjaylocke said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 5:22 pm
@GaryNull I’m a Christian Psychology and Counseling major and that’s mostly true, but there are some people in psychology who still treat it as a science and have integrety. Not many, but some. As far as drug companies…. they are about as corrupt and greedy as it gets. The DSM is very… well… it can be useful, in some cases, but there are also a lot of disorders that are totally left up to the interpretation of the insurance companies and doctors…
thatnewguy23 said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 5:31 pm
@GaryNull I’m sure some of them are. But there are regular everyday people who are just , if not twice, as twisted.
V8Fiero2M8 said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 5:47 pm
What about privacy? Is that respected?
sexualfuturist said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 6:28 pm
@GaryNull Sad, Very Sad but so Very True. Most therapist and treatment centers are not above charging for BS cures too.
GaryNull said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 6:41 pm
@pyro51090 “whats the point of this”
to jerk off to some hot chick talking about sexual perverts
GaryNull said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 7:29 pm
@sexualfuturist – but they can make a drug for it and billions of dollars.
GaryNull said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 8:10 pm
@thatnewguy23 psychiatrists are drug pushing evil worthless scum
GaryNull said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 9:08 pm
DSM = total bullshit.
Written by the drug companies.
Psychology is not a science and complete fraud.
cshawn1979 said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 9:53 pm
@cshawn1979 nor can I hear this on my computer– why is this video silenced?
sexualfuturist said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 10:15 pm
Sex Addiction? The issue is not addiction. Rather the inability to manage sexuality in a healthy way. Sexuality is not ingestible like alcohol or drugs. When people need help managing their weight they are not told to just stop eating and everything will be fine. They are taught to make better food choices. Sexuality must be managed, and knowledge is the key. Sexual Futurist has some ideas, please see our channel.
thatnewguy23 said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 11:07 pm
@pyro51090 psychiatrists have fetishes and a desire for strange sex too lol
msh1044 said,
Wrote on July 27, 2011 @ 11:54 pm
@jonathansstewart It’s not fair at all. Even IF all the suspicions where true it tells you nothing about whether a DSM V diagnosis is valid or not. If people want to critique the DSM ( which they are free to do ) they should make statements about the DSM directly and try to defend those. This is simply pure slander.
florencelovme said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 12:01 am
@florencelovme keep obsessing over this bad idea that all women have a problem with men and sex. You have me buffled. And plz cool down – showing a temper only makes you look more guilty.
florencelovme said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 12:20 am
@florencelovme (cont.) convict you for asking someone thier gender. what did you say or do that ticked off this woman? why did you even have to ask her that question when I assume it was obvious that she is a female? And why do you keep repeating that she and all women hate sex and that is why you got convicted? Isnt the assault of sexual nature? Because if its not, then why do you (cont.)
florencelovme said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 12:23 am
@studentoflife01 “Why is it that we have ‘Sexual harassment laws” that have no specific circumstance for sexual harassment in there of? Why is it that I Was Convicted of ASSULT”
I can only assume by your statement that it was a charge on sexual assault. But anyway, no judge in the world would (cont.)
studentoflife01 said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 1:01 am
I didn’t say sexual assault, you’re the one making shit up. A COMMON ASSAULT!?! ARE YOU FUCKIN’ ON HERION!?!? WHY THE FUCK IS THAT NORMAL TO GET AN ASSUALT TICKET WHEN YOUR 12 BECAUSE YOU ASKED IF SOMEONE WAS A MAN, OR A WOMAN? You’re out of your fuckin’ mind, get off my back you feminist pig. “Ah, you’d be accused with a common assault”! Are you paying attention to this shit?
ubuibme24 said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 1:53 am
the new DMM with some of their new classifications seems to me to make a mockery of the field of psychiatry,but then politics seems to be sticking its nose in many scientific fields and may be even taking the science out of these fields especially in pharmacy and agriculture .Much ofScience has been coopted by the military industrial complex at worst or by political agendas at best..WHO was formed by UN and Codex Alimentarius is a trade agenda and not a nutrition based organization
ubuibme24 said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 2:16 am
I love your work–just had to add the last comment in the interest of being objective….The doctor at the end does need to make sure that his patients do not suffer without their meds and it is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. However , it may be prudent to collaborate with a colleague on both the patients and the meds for the possibility of a guilty verdict.. . I think these stories need more info because a couple of sentences does not constitute guilt or a fair trial
ubuibme24 said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 2:31 am
a former patient doesn’t count….in psychiatry , the therapy is by nature , talking about the most personal matters and these doctors would tend to know their patients on an extremely personal nature and on an ongoing basis, also some patients tend to think they might want such a relationship thereby proving to themselves their worthiness and lovableness—not the same as a purely medical ddoctor who by nature and time constraints hustle patients through–
hotscubagreg said,
Wrote on July 28, 2011 @ 3:03 am
This chick reminds me of the chick that went to Haiti and found the water in the radiation room. Clueless!