Peter Joseph Speaks @ Occupy LA | Occupy Wall St Oct 15 ’11 [The Zeitgeist Movement]

Peter Joseph of The Zeitgeist Movement speaking at Occupy LA (Occupy Wall ST) Oct 15 2011 www.thezeitgeistmovement.com occupylosangeles.org occupywallst.org

The Emerging New Christianity Trailer In response to hundreds of questions and overwhelming concern with today’s revamping of Christianity Caryl Productions will soon be releasing a new and informative Multi-Part Series: WIDE IS THE GATE: The Emerging New Christianity Video Journalist, Caryl Matrisciana, author of Out of India: A True Story about The New Age Movement interviews friends, well-known authors and experts in a bold and challenging new DVD. Caryl examines the intrusion of the 60’s and 70’s New Age Movement, steeped in its pagan eastern mysticism, and traces its morphing over the last 4 decades..from its repackaging as the Self Help Psychology, Wholistic Health Movements of the 80’s, to its Seeker Friendly, Mega Church appearance in the 90’s, to its coming out in the 21st century as The New Spirituality. Its slick reinvention of “new truth” shows itself off today as a new “Emerging” Christianity, a Vintage, Ancient Future Movement that is supposedly taking us back to our “Christian” origins in the Desert Fathers of 300 years after Christ. Sadly, that “taking back” does not go back far enough. Missing is a return to the Early Church’s foundation, birthed in Jerusalem, at Pentecost, 40 days after the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who at that time, filled His Believers with His Holy Spirit and instructions to go out, preach the Gospel and make disciples. Today’s new brand of Christianity has a different gospel and is targeting thousands of the younger
Video Rating: 5 / 5


49 Comments so far »

  1. Bishal Neupane said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 9:25 am

    Hello, have you seen the Zerlux Cash Code (google it)? I found these amazing ideas that teach you how to make extra money on the internet from home.

  2. summondadrummin said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 9:38 am

    Interest seems to define the system and yet we seem so passive in regards to its centrality in radically imbalancing the playing field? Check out the essay In Whose Interest? Also check out The Money Fix.

  3. summondadrummin said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 10:01 am

    ” Allow me to issue and regulate a nations currency and I care not who makes the laws” This quote by Mayer Amschel Rothschild pretty much sums up the basis of the financial hegemony were facing. In this system money trumps everything. Okay so what can we do? I think a first step is to realize our money is based on fakery, really see through this mask of numbers and then begin to imagine what would work, what is and elegant way to exchange?

  4. TheHomoludens said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 10:55 am

    Yes, they are. Imo the VP thing is another manipulative tool of the “elite”. I´d rather live in the jungle than think about “future propulsion systems” – that´s mental masturbation for nerds, who think technology could save mankind.

  5. andrewpyrah said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 11:27 am

    wow you guys are insane

  6. TheGonzaPoker said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 12:20 pm

    somebody fix that dam mic….jeez guy drops knowledge on people, shoudlnt have to content with that shiz

  7. TheVenusProjectInfo said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 12:26 pm

    actually to be independent you would have to be floating in space. you depend on the world to live.

  8. TheVenusProjectInfo said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 1:25 pm

    go live in the jungle then

  9. OK2BCK said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 2:08 pm

    tough, he will be dead

  10. aKaStar3 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 2:32 pm

    MLK? :o

  11. aKaStar3 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 3:23 pm

    He would not want that..

  12. OK2BCK said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 3:34 pm

    if there are any kind of textbooks in next 100 years, Peter will have a chapter

  13. MrHectorMaximus said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 3:58 pm

    we do our best, thats all we can do i guess

  14. nakedanonymousspy said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 4:29 pm

    so i can’t seem to come to a conclusion on what is most likely to happen. is there going to be major change, eventually, and inequality overcome? or are there just too many people already so indoctrinated and set in their ways? i look to the venus project for instance and think, man that would be great, but then it seems so very, very unlikely. what do you guys think?

  15. anthonyontherocks said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 5:13 pm

    We are all SLAVES. Refuse the New World Order..Investigate!
    MilitantPatriot com
    MilitantPatriot com
    MilitantPatriot com
    MilitantPatriot com
    MilitantPatriot com
    MilitantPatriot com

  16. zirbat16 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 6:03 pm

    like now you are independent and free you forget that you need money to survive 

  17. Parnell50 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 6:26 pm

    This man speaks the truth, I demand change from my government, I demand that the 1% stop hindering advancements in science in the name of profit, I demand that the 1% give back the earth to the 99%, I demand that I see an end to the interest system, I demand that I see an end to the monetary system as a whole, I demand these things because as a 99 percentee I have the power/numbers to enforce these demands

  18. SlaveryHelped said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 6:31 pm

    I understood every single thing Peter Joseph said. This speech is better than MLK’s one.

  19. SlaveryHelped said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 7:13 pm

    What independence do you have anyway? You depend on a supermarket, a hospital, a car, clothes, a bank, where’s your independence you stupid baboon.

  20. SlaveryHelped said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 7:18 pm

    Centralisation just means organised. The power grid that you are on is centralised, that works doesn’t it? A house is centralised. You can live outside of the fucking city if you want and spend all your time earning a living, I don’t give a fuck, you probably wouldn’t do that anyway when you see everyone living a high standard of living and doing something meaningful in a highly sophisticated society.

  21. TheMidwestsk8ter said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 8:05 pm

    First of all it’s not a system of rule how can you be so stupid to not understand a simple idea? Your typing on a fucking computer right now..why haven’t you sent me a post card? Because the computer is faster and more efficent. If your agains’t technology go live int he fucking woods and leave tech to us. And centralization has not been done before in this context.

  22. rustyrt said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 8:59 pm

    and if i don’t want to live under this system of rule. Will i have to be re educated? Centralization never works.

  23. giroyagetme said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 9:27 pm

    part of me agrees with centralisation but part of me thinks fuck off n leave me alone to get stoned an just exist

  24. giroyagetme said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 10:09 pm

    fuck alex jones the capitlaist mug he sucks more egg then a fallopian tube end of the day no matter who says it there solution is basically world governnce no matter how they spin it …

  25. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 10:27 pm

    actually God did distroy us in the flood, sodom and gamorah etc, but you are right we are to love others as we are not God it is not our place to hate anyone..

  26. 19MadMatt72 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 11:03 pm

    God is love. His image. We are to strive to be that image. WE (not God) are commanded not to kill. Unless you can do so with love. Which is quite impossible. God can do whatever He wants, He is God after all! He does not destroy us, we do. Don’t blame anyone but yourself when you miss the plane and your standing on the tarmac.God bless! Great video, keep up the good work!

  27. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 11:11 pm

    you know what. I think you guys may be right after all. I think that I may have been subject to some “deception”… yet again. that’s not rare… it happens to me all the time.

  28. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 11:19 pm

    In an exchange with Abraham, God indicated that He would spare the wicked to save the righteous. He demonstrated this principle by saving righteous people from Sodom and Jericho prior to their destruction. The charge that God indiscriminately murdered people does not hold to to critical evaluation of the biblical texts. I hope that answers your question.

  29. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 24, 2012 @ 11:59 pm

    so really the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” is really not as general as the King James version would indicate. The commandment actually refers to premeditated, unjustified killing – murder. Although God ordered the extermination of entire cities, He did so in righteous judgment on a people whose corruption had led to extreme wickedness, including child sacrifice. Did God destroy the righteous along with the wicked?

  30. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 12:50 am

    were wicked. How “wicked” were these people? The text tells us that they were burning their own sons and daughters in sacrifices to their gods.16 So we see that these people were not really innocent. For these reasons (and others17), God ordered the destruction of the peoples whom the Israelites dispossessed.

  31. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 1:04 am

    you may ask What about when God ordered Joshua and his people to kill every man, woman and child in Canaan?14 What crime could be so great that entire populations of cities were designated for destruction? God told Moses that the nations that the Hebrew were replacing

  32. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 1:16 am

    Not only had all people become corrupted, but they were continually plotting evil!13 Is it possible that an entire culture can become corrupted? You bet! Recent history proves the point rather well. When the Nazis took over Germany before WWII, opposition was crushed and removed. When they began their purging of the undesirables (e.g., the Jews), virtually the entire society went along with the plan. So, the Bible indicates that no innocent people were killed in the flood.

  33. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 1:18 am

    According to the Bible, God killed every human except Noah, his wife, his sons, and their wives in the flood. Were any of these people killed unjustly? The Bible says specifically that all people (except Noah and his family) had become corrupted. so here God did not violate his own commandments.

  34. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 1:21 am

    To answer the question whether God breaks His own commandments, we need to determine if God committed murder (i.e., killed people without cause). The Bible is quite clear that God has killed people directly (the most prominent example being the flood) and indirectly (ordered peoples to be killed). If God ordered or participated in the killing of innocent people, then He would be guilty of murder. Let’s look at two of the most prominent examples.

  35. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 1:33 am

    The Hebrew word for “kill” in this instance is not ratsach, but nakah, which can refer to either premeditated or unintentional killing, depending upon context. Other Hebrew words also can refer to killing.6-8 The punishment for murder was the death sentence. However, to be convicted, there needed to be at least two eyewitnesses. The Bible also prescribes that people have a right to defend themselves against attack and use deadly force if necessary.

  36. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 2:33 am

    The Bible in Basic English translates the phrase, “Do not put anyone to death without cause.” The Hebrew word used here is ratsach, which nearly always refers to intentional killing without cause (unless indicated otherwise by context). Hebrew law recognized accidental killing as not punishable. In fact, specific cities were designated as “cities of refuge,” so that an unintentional killer could flee to escape retribution.

  37. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 2:52 am

    What you have to understand is that like English, Hebrew, the language in which most of the Old Testament was written, uses different words for intentional vs. unintentional killing. The verse translated “Thou shalt not kill” in the KJV translation, is translated “You shall not murder” in modern translations – because these translations represents the real meaning of the Hebrew text.

  38. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 3:10 am

    you still do not understand the law of God, your responce is very common that can only mean that your an Athest, so you do an attempt to demonstrate the contradiction of God’s commands “thou shalt not kill”

  39. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 4:02 am

    Indeed. Praise Yeshua. For he was without sin. And I am indeed a follower of Yeshua. Was the father without sin, though? Well… let’s see… The father objectively dictated that murder was wrong. And then proved that murder was wrong by murdering everyone by way of drowning to death. We’re not disputing that Jesus (Yeshua) was without sin. The question is, is the father without sin. Or is he in fact a demiurge? I anxiously await your reply. THANKS!

  40. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 4:48 am

    rendering it useless Jesus came to reconcile us to the father as he satisfied the law as he offered himself as a sacrificial offering because the law requires that in order payment be made for braking the law this must be done in Blood, so that we can have atonement (Forgiveness for sin).

  41. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 5:13 am

    God gives us his law because he knows that man is inherently sinful, if Murder was not in the law it would not be evil nor a sin.

    The Law is simply their to accuse us simply because we cannot keep it, if you study Romans 8 then you will fully understand what Gods law is.

    To answer your question directly it has always been Gods will that man is to be obedient to him, but we cannot, this is why the law separates us from God

  42. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 5:52 am

    And furthermore… If morality is in fact, dictated objectively. Then what are we to believe? Is God’s commands reflective of his will? Or are God’s actions refective of his will? Does God WANT us to NOT murder because he commands it? Or does God want us TO murder because that’s what he does? what are we supposed to do? what are we to believe? The commands or the actions?

  43. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 6:31 am

    yes, I hear you… and Thank you for your response. I really do appreciate it. I’m not even saying that you’re wrong. For all I know, you’re COMPLETELY right. I just find it strange that God would contradict his own values/ethics. Is there not a “better” way to teach a murderer that murder is wrong, rather than murdering him. In all of God’s omniscience, he couldn’t have concieved of a better method, than contradicting Mosiac Law? I don’t get it…

  44. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 7:18 am

    what the video is teaching is that Objective morality is determined by man not God, Gods law is based on his absolute authority that is in the Bible it self.

    In fact in John chpt 5 Jesus emphasis is on Gods justice and Judgment on man.

    God wrote the law for man the law was not written by God for God.

  45. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 7:56 am

    now, given that morality is dictated OBJECTIVELY… Is God for or anti-murder. In Mosaic law, he says he’s against it. Yet, he breaks his own law, time and time again. I’m not trying to be an arrogant, asshole. But, I know the definition of “hypocricy”. You can’t teach that murder is wrong, by murdering. That’s irrational. That’s precicely why we don’t have the death penalty here in Canada. I’m confused. Please provide some insight. Thanks.

  46. YoungMommy14 said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 8:48 am

    I’m a Christian. Let me ask you a question, out of curiosity. I find this concept of obective vs subjective morality quite intriguing. In the Old Testament, God murdered essentially the entire world. All unborn fetus’, babies, mentally challenged/invalids, people with no limbs, etc. And not nice, peaceful death either. It was by way of drowing, which is probably one of the worst, most unfortunate kinds of death imaginable. (continued)…

  47. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 9:08 am

    should be released soon.

  48. thegodsplumbline said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 9:34 am

    you can buy the DVD from carylmatrisciana (.) com

  49. BillyVeePersonal said,

    Wrote on August 25, 2012 @ 9:49 am

    Where do we buy the DVD?

Comment RSS · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.