Critical Issues in Forensic Psychology: False Confessions

Critical Issues in Forensic Psychology: False Confessions

The topic of false confessions is another very important issue within a legal context where psychological knowledge and expertise can be brought be bear. Psychological vulnerabilities and interrogative circumstances are two of the key areas that have been examined by psychologists in relation to false confessions.

The reason that the study of false confessions is such an important topic within forensic psychology is that research into the reliability of testimony and suggestibility is as old as the discipline itself.

Hugo Munsterberg

In 1908 Hugo Munsterberg published ‘On The Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology And Crime’. One of these essays was entitled ‘Untrue Confessions’. The writing of Hugo Munsterberg was not only groundbreaking but also very perceptive. In the first sentence of his essay on false confessions he stated that:

I am most seriously convinced that it is a tragedy not only of crime but also of human error and miscarried justice, and my scientific conscience as a psychologist compels me to speak of it because the tragedy of yesterday may come up again, in some other form, tomorrow

Munsterberg’s contention that false confessions were a normal phenomena triggered by unusual circumstances was most recently brought to light in the circumstances surrounding the John Mark Karr case. In relation to the unsolved murder of six-year-old JonBenĂ©t Ramsey, John Mark Karr claimed that he was present when Ramsey died and that her death was an accident. Authorities were made aware of Karr via the e-mail correspondence he had with Michael Tracey, a journalism professor at the University of Colorado. Karr was arrested in Bangkok returned to the USA for questioning. Shortly after, prosecutors announced they would not be pursuing charges in connection with the murder after DNA tests failed to place Karr at the scene.

Theoretical explanations for the psychology of false confessions

The work of Kassin and Wrightsman in the USA and Gudjonsson in the UK has done a great deal to further our understanding of the psychology of false confessions. To find out more about this work, along with links to a number of excellent resources on the subject of false confessions visit my main forensic psychology website.

Have Your Say

So what do think about the issue of false confessions? Why not post your views over at the All About Forensic Psychology Forum?

Find Out More

If you would like to find out more about false confessions, there is a detailed page dedicated to it on my forensic psychology website.

I have a first class honours degree in psychology and a Masters in Occupational psychology from the University of Sheffield (UK). For a number of years, I was a lecturer in psychology at the University of Huddersfield (UK). In 2003 I moved to sunny Spain with my family where I now work as a distance learning tutor and research dissertation supervisor.

It was as a result of my research activity that I ended up pursuing an interest in forensic psychology. Since 2000, I’ve been involved in collaborative research with teams of forensic odontologists (dentists) in the UK, US and Canada. Being involved and conducting research with a group that operates under the umbrella of forensic science meant that I had the opportunity to attend a number of forensic science conferences. Most of the conferences had a forensic psychology or behavioural science section; and as a result of attending presentations on topics such as criminal profiling, my interest in Forensic Psychology was ignited.

Article Source:

Comments are closed.